If there are images in this attachment, they will not be displayed.  Download the original attachment

Overall comparison grid

  A B C D E F G H I J
1   Safe Lancet by Smith's Medical Acti Lance Contact Activated Lancet by BD
2   Yes No No answer Yes No No answer Yes No No answer
3 Question 2 82% 18%   96% 4%   83% 17%  
Question 3 82% 12% 6% 92% 8%   100%    
Question 4 71% 23% 6% 88% 8% 4% 100%    
Question 5 36% 58% 6% 83% 17%   94% 6%  
Question 6 100%     88% 12%   100%    
Question 7 41% 47% 12% 70% 26% 4% 94% 6%  
Question 8 59% 41%   42% 58%   83% 17%  
10                     
11  Question 2 The product/equipment is easy to use            
12 Question 3 The product/equipment is safe to use in a pediatric setting          
13 Question 4 The product/equipment is clinically and developmentally appropriate for use in infants      
14 Question 5 The product/equipment performs its intended purpose and is acceptable        
15 Question 6 Adequate training was provided in order to use this product/equipment        
16 Question 7 Patient satisfaction/comfort will improve or remain the same by using this product/equipment    
17 Question 8 I would recommend this product/equipment for use          
18                    
19 Color codes                  
20   highest approval rating                
21   middle approval rating                
22   lowest approval rating                

Safe lancet by Smiths Medical

  A B C D E
1 Needle device evaluation form:  January 09  
2 Product or Equipment: Safe Lancet by Smiths Medical
3 Project Leader: Myra Horn RN, BSN, MHSA, MBA        
4 Number of responses: 17        
5 Times device was used:  < 5 times =  11        5-10 times = 5        >10 times = 1
6          
7   Yes No no answer Additional comments
8 I was appropriately trained on this device 53%   47%  
The product/equipment is easy to use 82% 18%   awkward, hard to push
10 The product/equipment is safe to use in a pediatric setting 82% 12% 6% pressure may allow for lancet to go deeper than intended
11 The product/equipment is clinically and developmentally appropriate for use in infants 71% 23% 6% possible to go too deep
12 The product/equipment performs its intended purpose and is acceptable 36% 58% 6% Bleeds too slowly, no blood was obtained, poor flow
13 Adequate training was provided in order to use this product/equipment 100%      
14  Patient satisfaction/comfort will improve or remain the same by using this product/equipment 41% 47% 12% squeezing on fingers to bleed, pt had to be stuck twice
15 I would recommend this product/equipment for use 59% 41%   finger does not bleed well, does not perform well
16 Major advantages of this product/equipment: It is safety
17   Good blow flow
18   Good for safety
19   It is easier to grasp and you have more control of the device
20   Easy to use, patient bleeds enough for collection
21   Great blood return
22   None
23   1.8mm great on adult fingers      
24    Have to press
25 Major disadvantages of this product/equipment: Poor flow      
26    Not a good sample      
27    did not penetrate enough to bleed properly      
28    didn't provide adequate capillary bleed on children      
29    Bllod does not flow freely, finger slow to bleed, have to force blood out      
30    awkward
31   Hard to activate poor flow
32   None      
33  Major disadvantages of this product/equipment cont: Didn't bleed well      
34    Not deep enough leading to multiople sticks to obtain specimen      
35    too much pressure required to release, causing inccreased pressure on site      
36    Degree of pressure may cause deeper penetration in finger      
37  Would you recommend that we try another product? Yes, could cause problems down the road      
38    Yes, haven't found a better device yet      
39    Yes, not a good blood flow      
40    Yes      
41    Yes, product does not perform effectively      
42    No I think this is the product that we all like      
43    No      
44    yes not appropraite for pediatrics      
45  Comments No good!!!!      
46    Very good      
47    I wish we could keep using this lancet in primary care      
48    Love this one!!      
49    Recommend only the purple one if necessary      
50    the children like this product because they did not feel the stick      
51    As a phlebotomist I did not like this product because I could not get a good stick      
52    Not a good device to work with      
53           

Acti Lance

  A B C D E
1 Needle device evaluation form:  January 09  
2 Product or Equipment: Acti Lance
3 Project Leader: Myra Horn RN, BSN, MHSA, MBA        
4 Number of responses: 19        
5 Times device was used:  < 5 times =  13        5-10 times = 5        >10 times = 1
6          
7   Yes No no answer Additional comments
8 I was appropriately trained on this device 42%   58%  
The product/equipment is easy to use 96% 4%   Had to press down too hard
10 The product/equipment is safe to use in a pediatric setting 92% 8%   twisting feature is a choking hazard, small pieces
11 The product/equipment is clinically and developmentally appropriate for use in infants 88% 8% 4% not as effective
12 The product/equipment performs its intended purpose and is acceptable 83% 17%   did not get adequate blood flow, did not perform well
13 Adequate training was provided in order to use this product/equipment 88% 12%   did not get adequate blood flow, did not perform well
14 Patient satisfaction/comfort will improve or remain the same by using this product/equipment 70% 26% 4% did not perform on every use, left bruise, pt didn't like
15   42% 58%   did not perform on every use, painful left bruise
16         multiple use to collect sample, product hurt
17 I would recommend this product/equipment for use       pt finger does not bleed well, did not provide adequate coll.
18 Major advantages of this product/equipment: none
19   Easy to use
20   Works well
21   Easy to hold on to and loose
22   Patient fells little to know pain
23   Easy to hold on to and loose
24   The 17 gauge would be a more versatile lancet, It could be used or heel sticks
25   or finger sticks of older children      
26    Works well with finger sticks      
27    When did perform, it worked very well on blood flow      
28    None      
29    Good for finger sticks      
30    Blood flowed well from foot for me      
31    No improvement over current product, more painful than BD or Saf T lance      
32    Easy to use, pt didn't complain
33 Major disadvantages of this product/equipment: Not comfortable for phlebotomist or patient      
34    Had to press too hard      
35    Blood does not flow freely      
36    Depth of cut, bulky      
37    Did not perform on every use      
38    Painful and left bruise at finger puncture site
39   hard to control
40   Can't place it on the feet so it can cut the foot      
41    When compared to other trial lancets that were 21 gauge or less, blood was      
42    obtained      
43  Would you recommend that we try another product? Yes continue with Tenderlett      
44    no      
45    No, Acti Lance      
46    Phlebotomist needs blood to flow better      
47    Yes just so that we can compare      
48    This product is difficult to keep still and puncture skin      
49    No I like these      
50    Yes staff not satisfied      
51    Would also like to suggest we look for a product without      
52    the twist off piece which is a choking hazard      
53    Yes, should not be painful      
54  Comments There were 3 different needle depths and I was not informed for the one to use      
55    for the age of the child      
56    Most of my blood sample clot using this product.  Blood does not flow as fast      
57    as needed.  I did not have problem with other equipment      
58    Used all 3 sizes on 4 patients none of them even said ouch, got good blow flow      
59    with all three      
60    Used only 17 gauge      
61    Used 17 and 23 gauge      
62    Makes noise on release that will cause patient to jerk - normal response      
63    Could cause a fear rather than puncture, could result in a jagged slice of finger      
64           

Contact activated by BD

  A B C D E F
1 Product or Equipment: BUZZY
2 Project Leader: Myra Horn RN, BSN, MHSA, MBA          
3 Number of patient/parental responses          
4  
5            
6   No pain Moderate Pain Severe pain    
7 How much pain did you experience during the procedure? 44% 56% 0%    
8   Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Not applicable
9 If the flippits were used, were they helpful? 45% 22% 7%   16%
10 I would ask for Buzzy again 74% 22% 3% 1%  
11             
12             
13  What did you like best about Buzzy? No pain
14   Helped
15   Reduced pain        
16    It vibrates
17   Helped me not feel pain as much
18   Helped with stick        
19    He's cute        
20    Vibrating, needs a song to sing        
21    It made there be no pain        
22    Colorful and silly        
23    Coldness        
24    Like Monkey's jumping on the bed        
25    The bee shape        
26    It didn't hurt        
27    Good distraction        
28    It vibrated        
29    The Buzzing thing        
30    Very good        
31    Helped with pain
32   Didn't sting as bad as when I had blood work before        
33    sound it makes        
34    A little distracting        
35    When I usually get shots it hurts more, but the vibration took the pressure off        
36    My daughter had no pain, I am so pleased        
37    There wasn't any pain        
38  Was there anything that you did not like about Buzzy? No        
39    Kold pak        
40    Child seemed a little frightened by vibration        
41    Felt weird, would like without next time, even though it helped with pain        
42    Didn't take all pain away        
43    Need to be able to take it off easier        
44    Nothing it was great        
45